tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6276561747841568697.post6885575303090461190..comments2024-03-27T05:23:48.855-04:00Comments on Krugman-in-Wonderland: An Unserious Political OperativeWilliam L. Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802990642236807359noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6276561747841568697.post-62054001975088232282012-08-20T14:51:41.117-04:002012-08-20T14:51:41.117-04:00I don't support either major party's budge...I don't support either major party's budget either, but Krugman could at least mention :<br /><br />1) That Ryan's budget's actually *increase* each year. Cuts are, as he said "reductions from projections with current policies"<br /><br />2) He mentions tax cuts (under Ryan) for the 1%, but in the "tax expenditures" details he cites, I'm fairly certain that they include increasing *everyones* taxes. not just the 1%.<br /><br />3) He doesn't even mention Ryan's Pentagon budget *increases*. My theory is that Krugman does not even want to mention what he "might" cut, because that would open the door to a real discussion of other cuts that he might not like.<br /><br />Certainly unserious, but typically dishonest is more appropriate.CPBrownnoreply@blogger.com