Bob Murphy always has interesting points on his blog, and he has a couple of posts that make for good reading and thinking.
In this one, he takes a hard look at the whole kerfuffle regarding Rogoff's nonexistent endorsement of "austerity," and in this one, he exposes Keynesian Logic (an oxymoron if ever there was one) for the fraud that it is.
I would like to add that Krugman really wants us to believe that Europe has been imposing an "unprecedented" policy of "austerity," although from what I can tell, Krugman defines "austerity" as not massively increasing government spending.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
34 comments:
Firstly, NPW (Nobel Prize Winner) Krugman wants us to ignore double digit inflation in education costs, high single digit inflation in medical costs, and energy costs that have remained substantially higher than 10 years ago (not to mention higher food costs). NPW Krugman wants to ignore inflation of financial assets, like stocks.
NPW Krugman wants us to focus on "core" inflation - a non-real world construct. Fine. You want to know why clothing costs havent risen? See the articles on the 400 people killed in an industrial "accident" in Bangladesh. When we outsource our labor costs to third world countries with low pay, slave conditions and no concern for safety, we can pretend that increasing the monetary base has no inflationary consquences. Electronics? Look at China's factory/cities.
BTW, if all the Fed money is sitting at the TBTF banks anyway, what was the point in printing it? How can it stimulate the economy? It's an internal contradiction.
Listen to NPW Krugman - don't save for a rainy day, don't save for retirement, take out a second mortgage. I'm sure he'll bail you out with some of his prize money.
I think I nailed Krugman today on Bob Murphy's blog:
http://consultingbyrpm.com/blog/2013/05/krugmans-botched-inflation-call-and-scary-other-country-reference.html#comment-62956
In comments to the same Bob Murphy post, Lord Keynes has engaged in total self-immolation once and for all. He argues that because businesses often find they cannot lower their prices while selling fewer units that Austrian analysis and the concept of economic calculation have been vanquished. That argument is so stupid that I must admit to being shocked at how stupid it actually is.
http://consultingbyrpm.com/blog/2013/05/krugmans-botched-inflation-call-and-scary-other-country-reference.html#comment-63029
Bookmark it.
Bob, how long have you been trying to debate with "Lord Keynes" and do you see any progress in sight? It must take a lot of energy to do this on a regular basis.
Bob Roddis@May 2, 2013 at 6:47 PM
No, Roddis, a perusal of that page shows your cowardly evasion of a simple question, time and again:
So you are saying that buyers and sellers adjusting prices in a flexible way in trades and thereby moving them towards their market- clearing levels is NOT a fundamental part of the Austrian notion of “economic calculation”?
Since you have been denying this for ages now in your bizarre interpretation of your stock Hayek passage, you know that a straight answer would destroy you.
That's why you're a terrified little coward.
Bob, how long have you been trying to debate with "Lord Keynes" and do you see any progress in sight? It must take a lot of energy to do this on a regular basis.
I think this "debate" goes back at least three years. I see immense progress yesterday after the clarification of his "fixprice" argument that I mentioned above. He's been eviscerated once and for all and all the world can see it.
Thank you so much for share such a wonderful article.I like the way of writing and presenting.I enjoyed a lot and i am very happy to see this type article because i got good information from this article.I refer some best essays for my academic writing.
Thanks for posting this. I wish it awriter
was able to be translated, but for some reason
Pretty,This has been a really wonderful post. Many thanks for providing these details.
casio
Thanks for this article. There is something to interest. Well written. Think hard to get the right result.
Well written. Thanks for sharing this. The content in this was very interesting. Amazing.
And what about ethical essays, Mr. Krugman? What about such type of writings?
Very ukessays interesting article, may be beneficial for me and who had already visited this page.
Keep up the excellent piece of work, I read few posts on this internet site and I conceive that your web site is rattling interesting and has got lots of superb information.
pikdo
Nice blog. Finally something different and the way you described it is short and sweet. That's what i like about a blog.
<a href="https://icasiostore.pk/>casio</a>
I must say you are an incredible writer, I love the way that you describe the things.
Thank you for the good writeup.
Hope to see more from you.
Great information you shared through this blog.
Keep it up and best of luck for your future blogs and posts.
Yes i am completely concurred with this article and i simply need say this article
Appreciating the commitment you put into your site and in depth information you offer
I am sending it to several pals ans additionally sharing
Great Post for Beginner to understand.
I would like to refer to your article on my blog and write it.
The total look of your site is wonderful, let alone the content material!
thank you for sharing this amazing piece of information
I do agree with all of the ideas you’ve presented in your post.
I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free.
Excellent website you have here, so much cool information!
I believe that this weblog is interesting. Thank you for your time and efforts here.
I am glad to see this site share valued information Nice one! Great dayyy
I have to thank you for the efforts in this blog. the quality is good thanks
Really amazed with your writing talent. Thanks for sharing, Love your works
Post a Comment